The Jim Rex Jobs Plan

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

So Jim Rex unveiled his jobs plan for South Carolina today, which, while not as "easy to process" as Sen. Vincent Sheheen's endorsement news from Charleston mayor Joe Riley, is still pretty big news because it actually gives us a sense of what he might try to do as governor. I've decided to provide some quick analysis on what's in here, and what's not. As a quick disclosure, I've kept in mind a simple suggestion from Ashley Woodiwisss offered in Bill Davis's recent article in the South Carolina Statehouse report that I think would work well for Democratic chances: a Newt Gingrich like "Contract with Carolina" or "Palmetto Priorities" that would offer clear, tangible goals that the Democrats could be judged upon during their terms (of course the tricky part is that they'd have to keep their promises). Remember, Gov. Hodges won his election basically by making it a referendum on the "education lottery," and I think the Democrats best chance is to do something similar. So, without further delay, my take on the Jim Rex Jobs Plan.


1. The title: "Jobs Now. Jobs for a Strong Future": This is the second major "slogan" from the Rex campaign that has left me completely cold. First, it was "It's time for a turnaround," which is still his campaign's main slogan. There's nothing wrong with that slogan. There's nothing right about it either, though, which is the problem. The same issue applies here. Jobs Now. Jobs for a Strong future. That doesn't exactly sound like something the people of South Carolina are going to take and run with. Oh, and he also refers to this as the "two parts" of his plan. Really. So your jobs plan is to create jobs now, and more jobs in the future. Interesting. I've never thought of a jobs plan like that before.

2. The "Jobs Now" details: Some ideas that seem likely to appeal to the Democratic base, like eliminating GED fees, raising the cigarette tax (note: Sen. Sheheen has been saying this same thing since February). Other ideas would seem to play pretty well across the board regardless of ideology, like the buy South Carolina initiative, the South Carolina Certified expansion, the ubiquitous and generic "support for small business," and the workshare option. Among the plans here, the cigarette tax, the elimination of the GED fees, the workshare option offer the most tangible benefits that people are likely to see. However, I don't know that they would have the kind of far-reaching implications that would make it seem to most South Carolinians like Jim Rex is working for them. Tuition reimbursement and unemployment extension seem like sound ideas with reasonably broad appeal, but they beg the question: where's the money coming from?

3. Jobs for a Strong Future: This section is much more vague, including political buzzwords like "infrastructure," "clean energy," "quality healthcare," et al. Nothing particularly concrete here, no specific plans. There's mention of a "task force," but I'd like to see more specifics from Rex here.

Overall, a decent effort, especially in the "Jobs Now" section where he provides much more specific proposals. The Jobs for a Strong Future, as it seems full of rhetoric but very little specifics. I'd also like to see a better way of selling this. Someone over there are Rex headquarters needs to work on their framing.

Posted by scgovernorsrace at 7:57 PM 1 comments  

Polling

Thursday, December 10, 2009

A new poll out from Public Policy Polling mirrors the results from Rasmussen's poll a week earlier, but PPP adds a wrinkle by including Sen. Robert Ford in the comparison. PPP shows Rex to be the strongest Democrat in the field, polling better than Sens. Robert Ford and Vincent Sheheen against Gresham Barrett, Andre Bauer, and Henry McMaster. Again, Rex beats Bauer and loses to Barrett and McMaster in a head-to-head. What's interesting about the PPP poll, however, is the comparative showing between Sens. Ford and Sheheen. The two state senators have nearly identical numbers against all three Republicans. First, this shows the relative weakness of Bauer, as Bauer's lead is within the margin of error against Senator Ford, and barely outside the margin of error against Senator Sheheen (McMaster and Barrett have comparative numbers agains Sheheen and Ford; however, McMaster fares better against Rex than Barrett). However, this can't be good news for Senator Sheheen. Last quarter, he raised more money than his Democratic counterparts, but that fundraising advantage hasn't translated into any polling success (the bright spot, if you could call it bright, is that he's the least known among the candidates; his "not sure" in the favorability ratings was the highest at 78%). These results also seem to indicate that the "not a Republican" vote is concentrated at around 26-28%, which is where Ford and Sheheen sit against McMaster and Barrett. However, as I mentioned in reference to the Rasmussen poll, these polls are very early in the contest, as the "undecided" vote seems to hover around 30%, which indicates that there's plenty of room to grow for all these candidates.


Oh, and in the "Captain Obvious" department, the breakdown of those polled indicates that liberals are a minority in South Carolina. Among those polled, 11% described themselves as liberal, 43% as moderate, and 46% as conservative.

Bauer: My Good Friend Huckabee

Tuesday, December 8, 2009


Mike Huckabee's recent unwanted publicity (his commutation of a man who later went on to murder four Seattle police officers) has not stopped Lt. Governor, and 2010 candidate for the top South Carolina job, Andre Bauer from posing for a picture with him tonight in New York. Not only was he seen with Huckabee, but he is promoting it as if a Huckabee affiliation or later endorsement can be an asset to him. On Twitter Bauer writes, "Speaking with my good friend, Gov. Mike Huckabee in NYC" attached with the picture posted here. This is very interesting considering that public endorsements usually don't translate into votes, but controversial affiliations can doom a candidacy. I'm not sure what the Huckabee effect will be, but I think that it would likely hurt Bauer more than help him. This is a very tough on crime electorate, especially in the upstate. Interestingly, a recent PPP poll suggests that Huckabee actually hasn't been hurt much by the controversy. I wonder what it would look like if they polled just South Carolina residents.

Posted by scgovernorsrace at 8:54 PM 0 comments  

Polling

Sunday, December 6, 2009



Thanks to Jim Rex's Facebook status, I'm now aware of a new batch of polling released by Rasmussen. The highlights: Jim Rex does the best of the two named Democratic candidates. He loses by 7 to State Attorney General Henry McMaster, by 6 to Rep. Gresham Barrett, and he actually beats by Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer by 1 (which, of course, is within the +/-4.5% margin of error, so technically it's a tie). State Senator Vincent Sheheen loses to all three candidates. Barrett does better against Sheheen than McMaster, but both candidates have an advantage of at least 17 points. Of course, "Some other candidate" and "Not decided" earn at least 28% in each matchup, so there's plenty of room for these numbers to change over the next few months.


On the Democratic side, I can't say that these results are particularly surprising. Jim Rex, as the only current Democrat elected to statewide office, currently offers the greatest name recognition. With that being said, he's already being afforded a tremendous advantage over his counterpart, Vincent Sheheen, as well as the other Democratic candidates; thus, he in many ways has the least room to grow of all the candidates. However, as Rasumussen points out, the closeness of the Rex races "is even more significant given the fact that South Carolina went for John McCain by nine points over Barack Obama last November and opposition to Obama’s health care plan is even higher here than it is nationally." For Sen. Sheheen, his success fundraising since February hasn't translated to any polling victories. At the same time, the toplines reveal that only 8% of people polled had a "Very favorable" opinion of Rex compare to 6% for Sheheen, and in the "Somewhat favorable" category, Rex only leads Sheheen 28%-24%. Surprisingly, more people had a "Very unfavorable" view of Sheheen to Rex (17%-12%), but more people responded "Not Sure" to Sheheen than to Rex (35%-27%). There's clearly a long way to go here.

On the Republican side, it's admittedly a little surprising to see Andre Bauer losing to Jim Rex, even if it's within the margin of error. However, his candidacy hasn't been particularly stellar, and his performance during the Natural Resources debate (which was technically before he officially declared); this news can't be heartening for him. McMaster and Barrett are the clear heavyweights on the Republican side, as their dueling fundraising numbers over the past months have indicated, and both do well against both Democrats. Surprisingly, in the toplines, Bauer scored 18% in the "Very favorable" category compared to 15% for Barrett and 11% for McMaster. However, Bauer also had the highest in the "Very unfavorable" category, with 21% compared to 7% for McMaster and 4% for Barrett.

Highlights Magazine

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Does anyone else remember reading Highlights as a kid? Do you remember how they would show two images side by side and it was your job to pick out the differences? Well, check out these two websites, one from Jim Rex (current Superintendent of Education):


And now from Frank Holleman, running for Superintendent:



I think the two candidates might have used the same web designer.

Posted by scgovernorsrace at 1:48 PM 0 comments  

Coming Soon

Friday, November 27, 2009

Over the course of the next month, scgovernorsrace.com will be launching as the news site for information about the 2010 South Carolina Governor's Race. We'll be serving as a centralized hub for all your 2010 news, which will be supplemented by analysis from two of South Carolina's self-proclaimed up and coming political minds. Watch us over the next month as we experiment with formatting and design, and look for our first posts on the state of the election and the impact of the Sanford Ethics Investigation on the election and its candidates.

Posted by scgovernorsrace at 4:23 PM 0 comments